TPO 34
The reading and lecture are about the possible explanations about how the sea cow extincted. In the passage, three possible interpretation that were challenged by the lecturer, was mentioned.
To begin with, the author states that Siberian people probably exterminated the sea cow in order to take advantage on the appropriate food supply, the sea cow. The lecturer is the opinion this hypothesis is faulty because the sea cow is so massive that few of them can provide enough food. Moreover, the body of native Siberians were not much such that they need to hunt magnitude of the creature.
Secondly, it is stated that modification of ecosystem caused kelp to decline in extent. For this reason, the sea cow extincted because of the lack of food. Nonetheless, the lecturer states that if change of climate had been so harsh that it affects the kelp, other species such as whales would have experienced difficulties. Actually, the body of whale was not went through decrease, which proves that shift of temperature was not that relentless. Therefore, kelp was not influenced and diminished by climate change, which means this is not factor of extinction.
Finally, the author posits that European fur sellers hunted the last sea cow and had advanced weapon which is suitable for hunting big amount of animals. Thereby, they might posed annihilation by fishing the creature. By contrast, the lecturer refutes this idea by mentioning that body of the species had been small by the time when Europeans came to the place. Furthermore, the sea cow had been existing for a long time before the eighteenth century, in which the creature extincted. Therefore, hunting for fur cannot be solid explanation of the extinction since it had already gone through the decrease of population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | ellen87713 | view | |
| 2022-01-30 | omega93 | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | vida00 | 80 | view |
- Pets should be treated like family members Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons to support your opinion 73
- TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 47
- TPO 25 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 7
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship Do you agree Why or why not Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09215017065 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76757929608 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552901023891 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8008657887 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385090723843 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123813370065 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900521778304 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2253831263 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410385535343 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.