TPO
The article states that for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology was faced with serious problems and limitations in the United Kingdom and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that in 1990, new rules established in Britain which improved the situation and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The professor refutes this point by saying that according to those guidelines, before starting any construction, the site has to be examined. He states that if that site is an archaeological interest, officials should make a plan to preserve artifacts.
Second, the article posits that many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. However, the professor says that any construction accomplished should be paid by construction’s company, not government. According to the professor, this rule leads to increase in size of sites for construction.
Third, the reading says that it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. The professor opposes this point by explaining that now archaeologists are provided a lot of well-paid jobs. We also learn that this change has contributed to increase in number of scientists.
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details. 76
- TPO 42 80
- The government is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the government should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that for most of the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s each of the author's reasons. First, the reading claims that many valu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d make a plan to preserve artifacts. Second, the article posits that many arc...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in size of sites for construction. Third, the reading says that it was diff...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25974025974 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.186147186147 0.158904122519 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0649350649351 0.0723426182421 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.021645021645 0.0435111971325 50% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.012987012987 0.0277247811725 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138528138528 0.128828473217 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0519480519481 0.0370669169778 140% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.31315182266 2.5805825403 128% => OK
Infinitives: 0.034632034632 0.0208969081088 166% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.12987012987 0.128158765124 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00865800865801 0.0158828679856 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.004329004329 0.0114777025283 38% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1342.0 1645.83664459 82% => OK
No of words: 200.0 271.125827815 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.71 6.08160592843 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04852973271 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.42 0.374372842146 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.35 0.287516216867 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.28 0.187439937562 149% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.195 0.113142543107 172% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31315182266 2.5805825403 128% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.539623497131 113% => OK
Word variations: 59.4019647546 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1818181818 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2844204793 49.3711431718 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 53.1818181818 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 2.03921568627 1.90840788429 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112098482156 0.142949733639 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0659609901902 0.0787303798458 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626365407248 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0987908300841 0.139662658121 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.322960163995 0.414875509568 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0971194692388 0.0530846634433 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.