TPO 37
The article states that an invention, Turtle Excluder Device (TED), can be an appropriate solution for endangered turtles, which accidentally caught in the commercial nets, to find a way which turtles can escape through it. But, there is some criticisms about TED and the article provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is a perfect idea and casts doubt on each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that with this idea, turtles get trapped rarely, and it is not satisfying for shrimpers. The professor refutes this point by saying that there are a lot of shrimpers all over the United States and it leads to adverse aftermaths. He states that because those turtles are endangered animals, even they get trapped accidentally it would lead to their extinction.
Second, in the article it is claimed that one method to protect those turtles is to decrease the time limit for shrimpers to keep their nets underwater. However, it sounds like a good idea but just in theory, the professor say. According to the professor, it is implausible to force shrimpers by time limit and government officials cannot monitor this whole limitation.
Third, the reading asserts that TEDs are not useful for species of sea turtles, which are larger, due to the fact that they cannot escape from nets designed based on the TED's standards. The professor opposes this point by clarifying that it is not a big problem. He states that the design procedures are not so difficult. So, designers can produce larger TED nets to prevent this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-22 | sh | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | zzbbbb | 3 | view |
| 2018-03-10 | alirezakasaie | 3 | view |
| 2018-11-30 | tarannomkhak | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | zzbbbb | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The government is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the government should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- TPO 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some criticisms'?
Suggestion: there are some criticisms
...ich turtles can escape through it. But, there is some criticisms about TED and the article provides thre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'trapped'.
Suggestion: rarely trapped
...posits that with this idea, turtles get trapped rarely, and it is not satisfying for shrimpers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...dea, turtles get trapped rarely, and it is not satisfying for shrimpers. The professor refutes th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60976140166 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551330798479 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.672977877 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.153846154 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.