tpo 40
The article mainly states that human cannot presence and maintain on the Venus’s surface because of its impossible and hard circumstances and provides three reasons to support. On the other hand, the lecture believes that presence of human on Venus’s surface is not challenging and it is possible. He refutes author’s ideas with bringing some reasons.
First of all, the reading asserts that pressure of atmosphere on Venus’s surface is really high and it is 90 times greater than earth’s surface pressure. While, the professor claims that atmosphere pressure on above Venus’s surface is low and equal in earth’s surface.
Additionally, the author suggests that there are not serveries of water on Venus’s surface, and atmosphere of Venus includes most of the gases such as dioxide carbon, nitrogen and sulfuric acid except a necessary gases like oxygen or water vapor. Whoever, the speaker argues that water and oxygen are both important for human, these necessary materials can obtain and make water from gases such as combination of sulfuric acid and dioxide carbon that there are on the atmosphere of Venus easily.
Finally, the text posits that the sunlight reaches the planet’s surface is so low because of thick clouds that fill the atmosphere and absorb the sunlight and reflect it’s to space. The professor supports that there much thick clouds up to surface which absorb sunlight, but can prepare electricity station above the clouds and produce more powers for human requirements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: TO_TOO[4]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...sorb the sunlight and reflect it's to space. The professor supports that ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, really, so, while, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42738589212 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83070892195 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547717842324 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0248988701 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305800941535 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137691037601 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538155098483 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180156611797 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324207610968 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.