In this set of materials, the reading passage explores the drawbacks of establishing new strict rules for regulating coal ash, and the professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, she casts doubts on these disadvantages, and in the lecture, she provides three specific points to substantiate her opinion.
First, although the reading passage suggests that the regulation has already existed currently, the professor argues in the lecture that we still need new regulations, such as new liner-special material rules. The old rule contaminates the water by disposing chemical materials; therefore, it is necessary to prevent the water from contaminating by setting new liner-special material rules. Clearly, the professor's argument refutes its counterpart in the reading.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that new rules discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products, the professor contends that other materials with strict new rules are still encouraged recycling. Then she supports this point with the fact that the mercury, which recycling rules have been established and enforced for a long time, does not discourage customers' for using recycled mercury products. In fact, it actually has benefits.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that the cost for implementing new strict rules increase, whereas the professor asserts that the positive results still outweigh the negative one. The professor explains that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that though the price of electricity power will increase to 15 billions, it only increases relative 1% every household. Hence, the cost of creating new strict rules will not be seriously increased.
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 73
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 60
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 70
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...er-special material rules. Clearly, the professors argument refutes its counterpart in the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257731958763 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.158075601375 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0927835051546 0.0723426182421 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0549828178694 0.0435111971325 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0309278350515 0.0277247811725 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134020618557 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0549828178694 0.0370669169778 148% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8908529973 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0103092783505 0.0208969081088 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00343642611684 0.00154638098197 222% => OK
Determiners: 0.120274914089 0.128158765124 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00687285223368 0.0158828679856 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00343642611684 0.0114777025283 30% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1694.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 259.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.54054054054 6.08160592843 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.420849420849 0.374372842146 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.362934362934 0.287516216867 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.293436293436 0.187439937562 157% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181467181467 0.113142543107 160% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8908529973 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.539623497131 112% => OK
Word variations: 64.4233204357 53.8517498576 120% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5454545455 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6672267101 49.3711431718 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 132.220823453 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.27272727273 0.878197800319 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 59.8388908389 50.5018328374 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.83098591549 1.90840788429 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.558350262723 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117910224695 0.142949733639 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0688703622533 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.642821649049 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169055657053 0.139662658121 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256927083705 0.266732575781 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109961206365 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.402788551103 0.414875509568 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0182274797831 0.0530846634433 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.394340880031 0.40443939384 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327348493914 0.0528353158467 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.