The author and the speaker both discuss three possible debated that related to the adaptation of a new law to control the handling and recycling of coal ash. These harmful materials resulted from burning plants as a waste product. The reader claims that we do not need new regulations to control these waste material. However, the speaker counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in to the passage.
First, the author states the rules that already have been existed, While the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that these regulations are not restricted enough and not sufficient. , And these regulations applied just for a new opening company, not for the old one. Another thing we have to but in our consideration these chemical products produce a leak in the lines and damage them. So we need new rules for both the starting business and the already existing one.
Second, the reading passage argues the costumer's concern about the rejection to use the recycling ash coal. Conversely, the speaker mentions there is another material also has a new arduous low such as mercury about the safe and secure for the recycling and handling. And there is no concern about the product from the consumer since the law submitted.
Third, the reader says the high cost associated with the new regulation. The professor points out that even though, the expensiveness of the new management for the company, but it is worthy of our environment. And we have the analytical record from the electricity company who implanted new rules and the 15 million increment in the expenditure, But the corresponding math report says that only a one percent increase in the electrical bill for the consumer.
- TPO 42 71
- Tpo37 68
- Genetic modifications of the trees. 71
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 67
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH FOLLOWING STATEMENT TECHNOLOGY HAS THE GREAT EFFECT ON CHILDREN LIFE?. 65
Essay evaluation report
both discuss three possible debated that related to the adaptation of a new law
both discuss three possible debated rules that are related to the adaptation of a new law
both discuss three possible debated rules related to the adaptation of a new law
These harmful materials resulted from burning plants as a waste product.
These harmful materials are resulted from burning plants as a waste product.
And these regulations applied just for a new opening company
And these regulations are applied just for a new opening company
the speaker mentions there is another material also has a new arduous low...
the speaker mentions there is another material which also has a new arduous low...
the speaker mentions another material also has a new arduous low...
even though, the expensiveness of the new management for the company, but it is worthy of our environment.
even though, the expensiveness of the new management is for the company, bu t it is worthy of our environment.
suppose the expensiveness of the new management is for the company, but it is worthy of our environment.
----------------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2 //you have issues on verbs
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 294 250
No. of Characters: 1434 1200
No. of Different Words: 157 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.141 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.878 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.594 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.337 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.344 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.585 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t restricted enough and not sufficient. , And these regulations applied just for ...
^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the electrical bill for the consumer.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, another thing, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98639455782 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67063144884 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2538961836 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344152767113 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113086380365 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058039310995 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198856236205 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550787169349 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.