TPO 43
The reading and the lecture discuss different theories about the way Agnostic used to live. The passage claims that there are three different theories about Agnostides' behavior. However, the speaker brings up three reasons to rebut all dubious ideas presented in the passage and states that each of these theories has serious weakness.
First of all, the writer holds the view that several pieces of evidence prove that Agnostides were Free-Swimming predators. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this idea and underlines the fact that these marine animals have not had appropriate organs for hunting. Indeed, all predators have big and developed eyes. However, the Agnostids fossils are strong evidence to prove that they had poor eyes. As we know, vision is one of the best tools for tracking hunts that Agnostides did not have. Moreover, there is not any evidence to show that they had a special sensory organ for tracking hunts.
Second of all, the author contends that Agnostides may live as Seafloor Dwellers. However, the speaker contradicts this contention and asserts that their moving speed and their ability for moving far do not match with seafloor dwellers’' properties. As a matter of fact, seafloor dwellers do not have the ability to move fast and for, so they live in small geography location. Therefore, the fossils of these kinds of marines should be found in small places. However, Agnostids fossils have been found in malty places that show the ability to swim far. This ability is unusual for a seafloor dweller.
Finally, the writer states that argonotids life depended on their hosts. In other words, they have fed from larger fishes. On the contrary, the professor rebuts this statement and stresses that the agnostid's population is an evidence to roll out this theory. In fact, parasitic's population cannot exceed a limited amount, since it harms the host. However, the agnostides fossils have shown that the agnostids population was large.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact', 'first of all', 'in other words', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256198347107 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.168044077135 0.158904122519 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0743801652893 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0523415977961 0.0435111971325 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0247933884298 0.0277247811725 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118457300275 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0330578512397 0.0370669169778 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50336492296 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0192837465565 0.0208969081088 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00550964187328 0.00154638098197 356% => OK
Determiners: 0.115702479339 0.128158765124 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00826446280992 0.0158828679856 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00826446280992 0.0114777025283 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1973.0 1645.83664459 120% => OK
No of words: 320.0 271.125827815 118% => OK
Chars per words: 6.165625 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384375 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303125 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203125 0.187439937562 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11875 0.113142543107 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50336492296 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 57.9673973743 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0529801325 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.7502111507 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5358017647 49.3711431718 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.65 132.220823453 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.7502111507 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.878197800319 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 46.3125 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.66292134831 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.572462245228 0.549887131256 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115898834538 0.142949733639 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0908048857481 0.0787303798458 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.500975626057 0.631733273073 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133174433278 0.139662658121 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208687447539 0.266732575781 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781241285102 0.103435571967 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328826298618 0.414875509568 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0339493647712 0.0530846634433 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.386077580391 0.40443939384 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530573217359 0.0528353158467 100% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.