TPO 43
The passage and the lecture discuss the theories about how a kind of marine animals called Agnostids had been living in the past. The reading presents three theories for this. Whereas, the professor argues against all them by pointing out her reason about why she is thinking all of them has some weakness.
First, the reading claims they could be free-swimming predators because other types of primitive arthropods were strong swimmers and active predators. However, the lecture disagrees with this theory because according to her, predators must have well sight ability to identify and track their hunt. Indeed, there isn't any evidence that can prove Agnostids have a good sight.
Second, the passage suggests that they might have lived is seafloor and feed on dead organisms or bacterias that were found in there. However, the professor refutes this theory completely because she believes animals living on the seafloor aren't fast at all, and they can live in just a small geological area. While there is a lot of evidence that shows they existed in large distances which can prove they were pretty fast. Thus, they weren't seafloor dwellers.
Third, the passage claims they might be parasites. However, the professor refutes this theory too, because according to her, parasites couldn't have a large population because the host's defensive organisms would kill lots of them. Thus, this theory isn't true because there is a lot of evidence that can prove they had a great population.
Although the passage suggests three theory about how Agnostids may have lived, the professor argues against all of them and explain why they couldn't be true.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
- TPO 55 3
- Some people prefer to give their opinions immediately Others prefer to wait and listen to others opinions before giving their own Which one do you think is better 85
- You are due to start a new job next week but you will not be able to because you have some problems Write a letter to your new employer In your letter explain your situationdescribe your problemstell him her when you think you can start 73
- TPO 40 73
- You would like to participate in a work related seminar in another country Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates program accommodation and cost 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'sighted'.
Suggestion: sighted
...ording to her, predators must have well sight ability to identify and track their hun...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ify and track their hunt. Indeed, there isnt any evidence that can prove Agnostids h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...believes animals living on the seafloor arent fast at all, and they can live in just ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n live in just a small geological area. While there is a lot of evidence that shows t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...prove they were pretty fast. Thus, they werent seafloor dwellers. Third, the passage...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...oo, because according to her, parasites couldnt have a large population because the hos...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ld kill lots of them. Thus, this theory isnt true because there is a lot of evidence...
^^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...gainst all of them and explain why they couldnt be true.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, well, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34865993276 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7461942211 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0990406706826 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428084268041 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191291444668 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597781148377 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264246305 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.