In the article, the author indicates three possible possibilities of how Agnostids live in the ancient, which were refuted by the professor in the lecture that all those hypothesis have their own weakness.
Firstly, the author suggests that the Agnostids could be a kind of predator. However, the professor indicates that the predator commonly has developed eyes because vision is important for predators to catch the prey. But the Agnostids only had undeveloped eyes, which was nearly blind. Additionally, despite the eyes, as the predator, the Agnostids should have other sensitive organs to help them catch the food, yet those organs were not found in the Agnostids' fossil remains. As the result, the possibility of Agnostids to be a predator is low.
Secondly, the author mentions that the Agnostids could be a seafloor dweller. In contrast, the professor says that the seafloor dwellers usually do not have ability to move fast and thus they tend to stay in the same area. Consequently, their fossils are always found in a small geological area. The Agnostids' fossil records, however, were found in multiple places across large scales, indicating that the Agnostids could have ability to move fast, and this ability is highly unusual in sea dwellers. Therefore the Agnostids could not be the seafloor dweller.
Finally, the author argues that the Agnostids could be a parasite. Nevertheless, the professor refutes that the parasites could not enjoy high population since too many individuals would kill the host. So we can tell that the Agnostids is not a kind of parasite since vast number of fossil remains of Agnostids were found.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 66
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 71
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage Others said there are better ways to stop them fr 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this hypothesis' or 'those hypotheses', 'those hypothesises'?
Suggestion: this hypothesis; those hypotheses; those hypothesises
...y the professor in the lecture that all those hypothesis have their own weakness. Firstly, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lity is highly unusual in sea dwellers. Therefore the Agnostids could not be the seafloor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17228464419 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67997876619 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524344569288 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.421175033 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412705726023 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155316231186 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839140324189 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259648249264 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348123798163 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.