The reading and lecture both discuss the silver coin that found at American archaeological site. While the reading provides three claims to support idea that this coin is not genuine historical evidence, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that this coin had been discovered at place where is far away from the areas of norse settlements. On the other hand, the professor argues this notion by saying that this great distance between Native american site and canada does not mean that this coin is fake. Moreover, Norse settlements came from lonf distance places and native american traveled great diatance. So, they are interested to obtain pbjects from Canada with them. As a result, this is coin is genuine historical evidence.
Secondly, the article states that there is no other coins had been found in these places. So, this coin is fake. However, the professor rejects this idea by pointing out that other coins are not necessary to confirm that coin is authentic. Furthermore, Norse did not create perminant settlements at Canada. In fact, they came back to Europe. So, they packed all silver coins with them. Consequently, they took all other coins with them.
Lastly, the article mentions that the Norse did not use the coins as money for trading. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by explaining that Norse knew that native americain's objects are attractive. For instance, they used the beauty silver to make nickles and jewlers. In addition, as long as Norse used attractive coins for other purposes, they did not used it as money for trade.
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 66
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the silver coin that found at American archaeological site. While the reading p...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t place where is far away from the areas of norse settlements. On the other hand,...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok all other coins with them. Lastly, the article mentions that the Norse did ...
^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... coins for other purposes, they did not used it as money for trade.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10820895522 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51111086332 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496268656716 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6762951838 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0555555556 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8888888889 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2777777778 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48737601465 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168625594414 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736524622104 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301871397339 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902911128669 0.0443174109184 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.