In view of the reading, the author enumerates a skeptical discusion about the flight ability of Pterosaurs which were large same as the giraffe and have wingspan of over 12 meters by pointing out 3 reasons of support. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made by the article and count them weak, then presents a piece of evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that the Pterosaurs were cold-blooded such as other modern reptiles. It should be noted that the cold-blooded animals have a slow metabolism which is not enough to much of the needed to fly. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the recent fossil study shows that they had dense heirlight Copelin which provided high body temperature when the outside weather was cold. So, there is a possibility for Pterosaurs's flight.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that so heavy are the Pterosaurs which never ever could have flied. Meanwhile, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that the weight of the Pterosaurs is unusually light and they had the hollow bone instead of the solid one. Therefore, they may could fly.
Finally, the author asserts the bereft of powerful muscles in their back legs as the last point for supporting the lack of flying ability in the Pterosaurs. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by alluding to differences between the birds and the Pterosaurs. The Pterosaurs, due to have the strenght muscles in their forth legs, could fly, even slowly. Also, they may run fast by pushing their feet.
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 71
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 73
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 85
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 81
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...e a slow metabolism which is not enough to much of the needed to fly. Conversely, ...
^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'flown'.
Suggestion: flown
... Pterosaurs which never ever could have flied. Meanwhile, the lecturer disputes this ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96958174905 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57227074589 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61216730038 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.410891203 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.538461538 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345087384491 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103198071719 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659197956911 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179411382162 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038584903483 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.