The reading asserts that different industries recently try to provide more habitat for fish by building more artificial reefs. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First, the writer argues that the more places devoted to reproducing artificial reefs, the more fish from different species would be in that habitat. For instance, the number of red snappers in the Gulf of Mexico increased after creating these types of reefs. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that the artificial reefs would attract more fish to live there and they might be greater in number for fishers to catch them at first, but it is high chance that this would lead to a decrease caused by overfishing them.
the reading holds the idea that making artificial reefs could improve the economic situation for small-scale fishers. these fishers could build their own reefs and have their special fishing spot. In contrast, the lecturer underlines that It is a bad idea in order to ot could lead to some safety problems such as the fish nest caught on reefs.
the reading states that it is also good for the environment because these reefs could be made out of recycled material. On the contrary, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that it would cause some environmental damage. for example, a reef made of tires could be crashed by storm and harm marines or other sea species.
- tpo 62 integrated 83
- tpo 57 85
- TPO 65 Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good 60
- TPO56 80
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: greater
...re fish to live there and they might be greater in number for fishers to catch them at first, but...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...a decrease caused by overfishing them. the reading holds the idea that making arti...
^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...omic situation for small-scale fishers. these fishers could build their own reefs and...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...such as the fish nest caught on reefs. the reading states that it is also good for...
^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... would cause some environmental damage. for example, a reef made of tires could be ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88211382114 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42783680791 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7877217771 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.181818182 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403586265412 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1512094003 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909304634907 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231867063661 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626107961916 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.