tpo integrated 28
The lecture and the reading both discuss if Robert Peary reached the pole or not. While the reading states that Peary reached the pole and enumerates three reasons of support, the lecture refutes this, saying that there were no solid evidence and the reasons mentioned in the reading were not convincing.
First of all, the reading claims that investigation of peary recorded that he reached the pole. However the lecture argues that the investigations are not completely objective. Furthermore, the professor states that the people who did the investigations were Peary friends. They contributed some money to do the investigations. Moreover, the investigations were done in 2 days, and the investigations were biased.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that Tom Avery made the same trip in less than 37 days, and that prove that peary trip was true and he reached the pole. The lecture counters this point by stating that the two trips were totally different. The weather condition during Avery trip was better than Peary trip. According to the professor, Avery did not take any food or heavy materials with him on his slit.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that some photographs support the claims that surf position of the sun at the pole during Peary trip was the same as the surf position of today’s sun. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that the photographs are not proving that Peary reached the pole. Moreover, the photographs were not established the sun. They were shaded and worn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 83
- tpo integrated 30 73
- tpo 48 integrated 3
- TPO INTEGRATED 44 73
- tpo integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in the reading were not convincing. First of all, the reading claims tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eary recorded that he reached the pole. However the lecture argues that the investigati...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...t the people who did the investigations were Peary friends. They contributed some mo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the investigations were biased. In addition, the reading makes the argum...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...avy materials with him on his slit. Lastly, the reading passage argues that ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hed the sun. They were shaded and worn.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09486166008 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67467759417 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482213438735 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1779466394 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9333333333 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39505263612 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141710129637 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124659049774 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258426893172 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681163925084 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.