TPO INTEGRATED 44

Essay topics

Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss about a European silver coin found in the North America. However, the writer holds a completely different point as the lecturer does. The reading passage proposes three pieces of evidence to dispute the truth of the coin as a historical discovery. While the lecturer challenges the statement with three pieces of evidence.
Firstly, the writer says that Maine, where the coin was discovered is far away from the Norse settlements. There is no obvious connection between them. However, the lecturer refutes this point by offering other foreign objects which were found in Maine. This strong evidence suggests the idea that the Natives traveled a long distance within the North America to collect exotic stuff.
Second, the passage claims that there were no other coins found in the Norse, so the coin was not brought by European. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that the Norse did not live in the North America forever. When they went back to the Europe, they packed their valuable property. As a result, the Norse might carry the silver coins to the North America and then bring them back to Europe.
Last but not the last, despite the fact that the Native Americans did not use silver coins as money, the Norse still could make use of coins to trade with the Native Americans. The silver coins are sparkling and shiny. The natives might be attracted by them and use them to make beautiful jewelry such as necklaces.
According to the three pieces of evidence above, the lecturer thinks the silver coin is not a historical fake but a true remain.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of the coin as a historical discovery. While the lecturer challenges the statement w...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, still, then, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84363636364 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27199697357 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4065362813 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.25 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461510644837 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147840995648 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094311997861 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251458459208 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586329736501 0.0443174109184 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.