The reading and the lecture are both about the "portrait of a teenage girl." The author of the reading passage feels that painting must be of Jane Austen. He supports his argument by giving three possible reasons. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. He thinks that, in fact, the reasons given by the author are not convincing.
First of all, the author argues that the painting was of Jane Austen, because her familly gave permission to use her portrait in her letters. This specific point is challenged buy the lecturer. He says that her family were not able to recognize her accurately, because they were died about 70 years before the painting was made.
Secondly, the author contends that the painting must be of Jane Austen, because the face of the painting resemble with the sketch of the Cassandra. Since, Cassandra made several sketch of the Jane Austen, so it must be her portrait. This point is rebutted by the lecturer. He points out that the family of Jane Austen was large and there were many teenagers at the same time, so painting must be of other relatives of Jane Austen.
Finally, the author posits that the painting must be of Jane Austen, because there was evidence that shows, the painting was created by the Ozis Humphrey. Austen Family were wealthy, so that they hire Ozis Humphrey to sketch painting of Jane Austen, because of his distinctive style. In contrast, the speaker's opinion is that the material used in the painting was started to sell in Europe only after when Jane Austen was 27 years old. Hence, the painting must be of other people rather than Jane Austen.
- TPO 29Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska s North Slope a region that today experiences an extremely cold arctic climate One hundred million years ago when those dinosaurs were alive the environment of the Nort 68
- TPO6 Integrated Essay 3
- TPO6 Integrated Essay 3
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sketch seems to be countable; consider using: 'several sketches'.
Suggestion: several sketches
...of the Cassandra. Since, Cassandra made several sketch of the Jane Austen, so it must be her p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en. Finally, the author posits that the painting must be of Jane Austen, because...
^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...his distinctive style. In contrast, the speakers opinion is that the material used in th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76325088339 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35848188229 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469964664311 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3362906282 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459200847649 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17547122918 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132531590538 0.0662205650399 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301416004276 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106490545424 0.0443174109184 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.