tpo21
The reading and lecturer are about Genetic modification which is a new approach and with the help of change of an organism's gene, it can create the trees with fast growth and more fruits. The article provides three reasons to support this method. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the reading and finds all of arguments unconvincing.
First of all, the author of reading declares that Genetic modification will cause the new trees to resist in front of harmful damages in comparison with unmodified trees such as a new pest-resistant papaya tree in Hawaii which is resistance in cope with a ring spot virus. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She points out the natural trees have adapted to survive in any condition for many years. For instance, unmodified trees can tolerate changes of climate or different types of insects; however, modified trees have been designed for a specific circumstance and they will not be able to bear unpredictable conditions.
Secondly, the article contends that since genetic modification trees can grow quickly and provide a large number of fruits; therefore, these types of trees can be cost-effective; conversely, the professor expresses that it is true that modified trees would grow in a few years and produce more products but gathering their seeds or fruits requires much cost because they need to hire more workers for this task, so it cannot be much effective.
Finally, the reading passage states that nowadays, wood companies are cutting down natural trees for building material or wooden products; hence, the natural trees may become extinct. Yet, with the aforementioned approach, wood companies will attempt to employ modification trees because as I said before, they grow quickly and as a result, natural trees can be protected. This argument is rebutted by the professor and she poses that genetic modification trees grow aggressively; consequently, they can compete for light, soil and water with natural trees. In such frustrating condition, they may prevent from access of natural trees to needed resources for growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | amy2016 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | aaron_105 | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-29 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisms'' or 'organism's'?
Suggestion: organisms'; organism's
...roach and with the help of change of an organisms gene, it can create the trees with fast...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s three reasons to support this method. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tion trees can grow quickly and provide a large number of fruits; therefore, these types of trees...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21238938053 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78925362453 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554572271386 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.415843212 49.2860985944 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.25 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.75 7.06452816374 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450764534945 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15776473081 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100170286014 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278274273842 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854383737919 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.