tpo37
Both of the reading and lecture are about TED. To elucidate, it can be said, when shrimpers want to catch shrimps by using nets, the sea turtles can get caught in these nests unintentionally and since they cannot breathe for a long time underwater, the turtle population may die; however, in the TED method, there is a passage that turtles can escape. The reading provides three reasons that this strategy is not appropriate and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that shrimpers believe the trapping process of the turtles happens scarcely. Meanwhile, this process is not cost effective because a great number of shrimps can escape through the mentioned passage which is designed for the turtles. This point is challenged by the professor and she points out that there are more than one thousand shrimps- fishing ships, so even accidentally, during a year one thousand the turtles can be caught by the shrimp nets; hence, a huge number of the turtles can be lost.
Secondly, the article contends that another alternative approach is that shrimp fishers would apply a limit time for maintaining their nets underwater; in contrast, the lecturer expresses that this method is impossible. Since there are a great number of ships in the sea; therefore, the government must control the limit time for all of them, consequently, the aforementioned way is not effective. The best way is that fishers can employ TED and before leaving the port, fishers should check the created passage in the net.
Finally, the reading passage states that TED approach is not adequate for some species of the turtles such as loggerhead and leatherback because they are very large; subsequently, they will not be able to escape from passages. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer and she poses that these types of species live in specific areas of sea, so with regarding this, fishers should use TEDs which have large passages in related to loggerheads and other enormous the turtles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-17 | Springlovers | 3 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 349.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0229226361 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60796304657 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54441260745 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4812976412 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.083333333 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0833333333 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06452816374 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.