The article states that there are three ways help to prevent the infection of the oak trees which infected by the P. ramorum fungus, and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor claims that the three methods have a serious limitation and unconvincing, and he refutes each of the author reasons.
First, the reading asserts that prevent the spreading of the spores will be an effective way by encouraging people to clean up their shoes and bike. The professor counters this point by saying that the cleaning shoes has a little effect, not a huge impact for the prevention. In fact, the study shows that there is another cause for spreading of the spore which is the rainfall. The rainfall washed out the water to the stream which helps to spread the spore to the long distance which will be more difficult to control.
Second, the author points out that using fungicidal chemicals helps to protect the oak trees. The lecture contradicts this idea by telling that this strategy needs to inject the chemicals directly and the process has to be repeated every few months. Indeed, inject every single tree in the forest every few months is expensive and impractical.
Third, the reading explains that the clear-cutting method helps to protect the oak tree by cutting and burning the infected trees and surrounding trees. However, the professor posits that cutting surrounding healthy trees will sacrifice the trees. Moreover, there are some trees in the United State are rare, and not easy to come back after cutting them. Therefore, this strategy will damage the ecology.
- Genetic modifications of the trees. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
- Tpo 34 64
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 69
- Tpo 22 71
Essay evaluation report
oak trees which infected by the P. ramorum fungus,
oak trees which are infected by the P. ramorum fungus,
oak trees infected by the P. ramorum fungus,
the three methods have a serious limitation and unconvincing,
the three methods have a serious limitation and are unconvincing,
the reading asserts that prevent the spreading of the spores will be an effective way
the reading asserts that preventing the spreading of the spores will be an effective way
Moreover, there are some trees in the United State are rare
Moreover, some trees in the United State are rare
Moreover, there are some trees in the United State which are rare
---------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2 //read a good grammar book
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 265 250
No. of Characters: 1292 1200
No. of Different Words: 138 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.035 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.875 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.351 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.385 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.196 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.592 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4393125341 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6528587366 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.