tpo43
The material discusses the concept of the way that Agnostids ate and behave. While the reading details certain looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain point outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details some points in regard to this topic, namely they agnostids might be swimming predators. In addition to that, they might be seafloor dwellers. One final point, the possibility they were parasites.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points. One specific contradiction is that arthropods predators have large eyes with strong vision, in order to be able to catch small animals. While agnostids’ eyes were so poor, they were almost blind so they supposed to have another sensory organs gave them that ability to catch prey, but there were no evidence of this in the fossils record. Next, agnostids were not seafloor dwellers, because they moved pretty fast and spread across large distance, while seafloor dwellers moved very slow and occupy small area. Finally, usually the parasites populations are small, because if they were too many, they would kill off the host organisms they live on. the vast number of agnostids have been found indicated that the great size od population of them, so it seems to rule out the theory that they are parasites.
In summary, there are obvious discrepancies with the information presented as each piece illustrate varying perspectives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...point outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details some points...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the possibility they were parasites. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out the theory that they are parasites. In summary, there are obvious discrepanc...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... piece illustrate varying perspectives.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, in summary, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31578947368 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65405605491 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627192982456 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9988662 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390871233134 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12888313916 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823352460885 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174834256919 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138396445315 0.0443174109184 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.