TPO48

Essay topics:

TPO48

The reading reveals that there are three methods which can be used for preventing the problem of declining frog populations. However, the professor explains that the solutions mentioned in reading are not a practical solution and refutes each of author reasons.
First, frogs are harmed by pesticides which are chemicals used by a farmer to save their crops from insects and this chemical damage frog's breathing system. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this point by saying that reducing or regulate law to prohibit using pesticides have many disadvantages for the farmer and this causes many of their crops damage and by not using pesticides they can not compete with others farmer.
Second, based on the reading, a fungus which spread around the world have a deathly effect on frog and is major factor decrease in frog population. Conversely, the professor states that we have to catch frog individual for treatment its skin fungus and on a large scale it is a difficult task to do. Also, for preventing this problem we have to use this work again and again which is complicated and cost a lot.
Third, according to the reading, frog's natural habitats are threatened by human activities like excessive water use or the draining of wetlands. In contrast, the lecturer contradicts this point reasoning that global warming is threatened natural habitats of frog and because of it, many water habitats are disappeared. In fact, preventing the human activities is unlikely to help saving water habitats of frogs.
Therefore, specifies reasons mentioned in the reading do not make sense.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-24 zmz 80 view
2022-07-16 Braun 80 view
2021-09-18 JesseSang 85 view
2020-09-22 Hamide 70 view
2020-08-09 MinaSh 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...he human activities is unlikely to help saving water habitats of frogs. Therefore, sp...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70005385917 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5453676342 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.909090909 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482039405778 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179628160246 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116585007176 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21814960724 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121892479213 0.0443174109184 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.