Tpo52
In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that sending people on an asteroid would be a successful colonization option, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that arguments made in the reading are dubious and unpractical, and gainsays each of them.
First and foremost, the reading begins by asserting that asteroid low gravity provides the favorable circumstances for landing and taking off as spacecraft would not be repelled forcefully. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this claim by pointing out that no doubt low gravitational pull is helpful for landing and taking off, but it would cause serious health risks to space crafts. To be more specific, low gravity would result in the loss of muscle mass and bone density, which are deleterious for long term stay on asteroid.
Furthermore, the lecture mentions that there is no guarantee that metals found on asteroids would keep the high monetary value. He explained that because of the saturation in the market and high supply of metal, it could be possible that the market price of metal would be reduced. Furthermore, the cost of transporting that metal would be extremely high, therefore mining would not get any benefit. These claims refute the writer's implication that mining on the asteroid would result in access to the valuable and precious metals, that would be pretty profitable.
Ultimately, the writer wraps its arguments by declaring that these asteroids are located closer to the earth therefore, it could be easy to reach them and land on them, unlike Mars. Not surprisingly, the speaker takes an issue with it by contending that though it is easy to reach on asteroids, it would be arduous to return. To be more clear, he explains that asteroids are closer to the earth's orbit at one point, but because of their revolution sometimes they go as far as Mars, or even farthest. Hence, this would not be a realistic approAch.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Archeological artifacts 3
- TOEFLbank airfilters 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- Remberdt portrait 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'risks spacing'.
Suggestion: risks spacing
... off, but it would cause serious health risks to space crafts. To be more specific, low gravit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terious for long term stay on asteroid. Furthermore, the lecture mentions that t...
^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of metal would be reduced. Furthermore, the cost of transporting that metal woul...
^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...et any benefit. These claims refute the writers implication that mining on the asteroid...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97872340426 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67516230919 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6233519209 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470316301365 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176889784991 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611524987799 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283607165897 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520052800209 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.