High taxes on unhealth food and cigarettes is the focus of both the writer and the professor. In writing, three reasons , including keeping people away from unhealth habits, financial fair, and revenue of government, have been elaborated. The professor, however, claims that these three reasons are not convincing.
As opposed to the writer's idea that high unhealth food taxes discourage people 's unhealth habits, the professor states that people would buy cheaper cigarettes which have a lower quality and contain more harmful components. Also, people living unhealthy lives will buy cheaper unhealth food for replacement. She advances the reason by saying that people who like junk food will spend less money on health food if taxes on junk food increases, because the total income contain in certain number for a period of time.
The professor continues to discredit the writing's assertion that taxes are benefit for financial fair, in which these by examining the fact that it is unfair for low income people. In detail, she points out that bad food taxes are more burden for low income people than high income, which means the people with the relatively low salary will cost more money in food than high salary.
It is the professor's third argument that taxes are negative for governemnet, which contradicts to the view of the writer that it is positive. To explore it deeper, the professor contends that the governement will gain a lot of money in taxes, so that they will focus on these incomes and will ignore other laws on keeping people healthy and eliminating the unhealthy stuff.
An apparent divide exists between the writer and the professor on high taxes of unhealth food.
- TPO53Independent Task Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy pro 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Disagree or agree It is impossible to be completely honest with your friend
- People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the professor. In writing, three reasons , including keeping people away from unhe...
^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...re not convincing. As opposed to the writers idea that high unhealth food taxes disc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d contain more harmful components. Also, people living unhealthy lives will buy c...
^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... income contain in certain number for a period of time. The professor continues to discredi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writings'' or 'writing's'?
Suggestion: writings'; writing's
...he professor continues to discredit the writings assertion that taxes are benefit for fi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06785714286 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45673289771 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507142857143 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5473545428 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 7.06452816374 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304174838906 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129777809192 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429318110133 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178134865769 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035556658901 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.