The article claims that when a professor appears on television as a guest to deliver expert commentary on the latest events in the world the professors themselves, university and the general public gets benefited from it. The lecturer disagrees. He goes on to say that this can be beneficial sometimes but there ase serious shortcomings with it.
Firt, the author says that when a professor appears on TV, general public gets to know his idea which were previously known only to other academic fellows. The lecturer believes that there are flaws to this argument. He contends that instead a professor will not be considered seriously by other academic fellows. He goes on to say that he we are not invited to conferences, meetings and even will not be awarded any money for his research because his sole purpose is entertainment.
Secondly, the author claims that universities also benefit by this due to its increased reputation. This will lead to more donations and more application from potential students. Again, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that this time wasted on TV appearances can be utilized in doing research, focusing on university's business and meeting students to help them.
The author also states that public gains from professor's appearance. They have a chance to learn and get insight about the real expertise in the field. The lecturer, however, disagrees with his viewpoint. He holds that the TV are just expecting academic title in their shows but not profound insights about professor's expertise. Also, the public doesn't expect deep technical knowledge in the field. He says that this type of speech can also be delivered by TV reporter with little bit of study.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- Altruism in meerkat and humans 82
- Driverless cars 76
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 50
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ofessors themselves, university and the general public gets benefited from it. The lecturer di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ys that when a professor appears on TV, general public gets to know his idea which were previo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... professors expertise. Also, the public doesnt expect deep technical knowledge in the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...n also be delivered by TV reporter with little bit of study.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07473309609 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72115198534 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0690272019 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06452816374 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161309667701 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045993079181 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751986177912 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990290456762 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243911583221 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ofessors themselves, university and the general public gets benefited from it. The lecturer di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ys that when a professor appears on TV, general public gets to know his idea which were previo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... professors expertise. Also, the public doesnt expect deep technical knowledge in the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...n also be delivered by TV reporter with little bit of study.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07473309609 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72115198534 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0690272019 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06452816374 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161309667701 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045993079181 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751986177912 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990290456762 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243911583221 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.