In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent)of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option.
The reading is talking about three benifits of working for four days a week with less payment rather than working five days per week. These benefits are foe the company, the employee, and the country. In response, the professor says that these benefits will not be in the way that the article mentioned.
To begin withe, the reading clams that the profit of the company is going to increase because employees would feel more rested and alert which means there will be less costly errors. In contrast, the lecture says that the profit will not increase because if they apply the four days regimen, they are going to need more employees, which means more expenses such as costs for training , office spaces, computers and medical benefits; that are fixed regardless the number of working days.
Second, the reading says that the rate of unemplyment will decrease if compnies offer a four days working way, and this is a great thing for the country. According to the professor, it will not happen. As he said before, hiring new worker is costly, so companies would prefer to go for other options like working for over time. In the other hand their expectations are going to increase; they want the same amount of work in those four days without any additional workers, which is unpleasent for employees.
Finally, the reading illustrates that with four days working, people's quality of life will increase because they will have more free time with their families. However, the professor opinion is that these individuals are going to have a negative effects on their life. Their work stability will decrease, and they will be affraid of losing their jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- An international organization has started issuing certifications to wood companies who meet a high ecological standard by conserving resources and recycling materials in an effort to encourage ecological sustainable forestry practices Certified companies 80
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- In general people are living longer now Which of the following do you think accounts for this phenomenon Technological improvements Changes to education systems Improvements to our diets Use specific details and examples in your answer 61
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 81
- TPO 47 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not be in the way that the article mentioned. To begin withe, the reading ...
^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...more expenses such as costs for training , office spaces, computers and medical be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, in contrast, such as, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8896797153 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32298466063 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7835605862 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306672659817 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108722848616 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873695533483 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188829389591 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527973486223 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.