zoo
It has been claimed in the passage that zoos have benefits to the society and can be source of considerable merits both modern culture and animal life. The writer has coaxed his assertion providing three justifications for validity of zoos. However, those explanations have been rebuffed by the professor according to the listening part who declared that zoos are in contravention of animal rights.
Firstly, it has been commented by the writer on appropriate behavior towards animals living in the zoos which results into animals be healthier, happier, well nourished and live longer. The professor’s opinion although, is in strong opposition to writer’s by exemplifying two red pandas died from rat poison. It shows obviously, poor preservation and lack of efficient and careful attention of animal seekers.
Secondly, it is stated in the passage that zoos are regarded as educational places more than entertainment centers. Although according to professor’s mention, many people are tempted going zoos owing to see average kinds of animals and so there is no educational effect on public learning.
Thirdly, it is argued about the potential of zoos in preserving endangered species where provide a suitable place for them to birth and increase in number. However, the professor opposes this statement and verifies it saying about the low degree of this method’s success. Being of the same families, many endangered species suffer birth defect and makes this method unreliable.
In conclusion, giving some thought both writer and professor’s claims, it seems that the statements of the passage cannot be counted reliable. Although the writer persists with various benefits of zoos in society, according to the listening part the disadvantages outweighs and animal rights are still violated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 76 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 65 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efect and makes this method unreliable. In conclusion, giving some thought both ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and animal rights are still violated.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53214285714 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06237036377 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7776771957 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249400405135 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943409310302 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887887134345 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150714480042 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617679849311 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.