People can use a mobile phone to answer work amd home calls at any place or 7 days a week. Do you think there are more negative or positive effects on both individuals and society.
Mobile phone is good for business to fastly answer any call at any location. I beleive that cell phone is beneficial but in other hond, some demerits are available. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. The both propositions appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my veiws for this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
Analysing the statement and explaining further positive impact of this trend. Firstly, telephone is important for many places such as service center, hospital and some other. However,folks easily to conversation with each other. Moving further,in the field of doctors they easily to find out patient report. In further step,many companies carry our business with the help of cellphones like as amazon, Snapdeal and many more. Moreover,it is a sign of development because they provide home delivery service for folks.
Probing ahea,there are some negative aspects of this trend that they remove our attention. However, dwellers are try to concentrate on work while,the calls or messages of social media apps are distract to mind. In further step,mobile phones also erase family attention because they always spend our time in cellphones.
In conclusion, eve though mobile phones are not beneficial for health to use everytime but somewhere it is must important in various sectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | Babaldeep singh | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , folks
...center, hospital and some other. However,folks easily to conversation with each other....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ersation with each other. Moving further,in the field of doctors they easily to fin...
^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , many
...find out patient report. In further step,many companies carry our business with the h...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...amazon, Snapdeal and many more. Moreover,it is a sign of development because they p...
^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...elivery service for folks. Probing ahea,there are some negative aspects of this trend...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ers are try to concentrate on work while,the calls or messages of social media apps ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'distracted'.
Suggestion: distracted
...ls or messages of social media apps are distract to mind. In further step,mobile phones ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , mobile
...ps are distract to mind. In further step,mobile phones also erase family attention beca...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31696428571 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7526620638 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.660714285714 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6451545424 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9333333333 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147017148147 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481422576663 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594123781864 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086475183745 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314507704989 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.