For a successful company, selling products depend more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discounts and offers, To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the corporate world, companies vie with each other to make customers buy their yields so that they accumulate immense profit. It is debatable that to get accomplishment, industries should approach buyers either by offering lucrative benefits or with the help of brand or company's name. I, personally, completely disapprove this idea as the present customers have adequate knowledge to opt quality products. this essay will shed some light on my belief with some lucid examples.
To commence, the first and foremost reason why the manufactured goods of the industries acquire public acceptance is the quality that they hold. If the products consist high quality, more people buy them and consequently, the selling rate increases. Moreover, sound quality goods elevate the company's prominence as people start to trust their efficacy, thereby, become renowned amid all other rivals. For instance, the Rolex Watch is famous all over the world not due to any kind of schemes and producers fame but its cutting-edge technology and material. Thus, the true consumers really seek for the top-tier quality products instead of fake popularity and appeasing schemes.
Furthermore, the prestige of any brand can fade away by the time and discount offers also do not last for ever and so is thoroughly worst idea to attract people. Many factories earned popularity just because they had come up with effective and sustainable goods and convinced the users, otherwise, they would not have experienced such promising fame. also, discounts and appealing offers can increase buyer's number, yet do not endure for longer period, hence, both ideas get failed shortly.
To conclude, the effect of name, fame and other incentives do tend to disappear in future, therefore, any company should not be concentrated only to advertise their brand and extra prizes. instead of this, their motive should be earning respect and trust of customers which, as a result, can be converted into reward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...uate knowledge to opt quality products. this essay will shed some light on my belief...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... my belief with some lucid examples. To commence, the first and foremost reas...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke popularity and appeasing schemes. Furthermore, the prestige of any brand c...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'thoroughly the worst'.
Suggestion: thoroughly the worst
...ers also do not last for ever and so is thoroughly worst idea to attract people. Many factories ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...t have experienced such promising fame. also, discounts and appealing offers can inc...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence, both ideas get failed shortly. To conclude, the effect of name, fame an...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 81, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d other incentives do tend to disappear in future, therefore, any company should not be c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...advertise their brand and extra prizes. instead of this, their motive should be earning...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, for instance, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 5.05154639175 337% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 32.9175257732 55% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 937.175257732 179% => OK
No of words: 315.0 206.0 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32698412698 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69047572225 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 127.690721649 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.622605031667 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 290.88556701 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4765717982 44.8134815571 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 76.5299724578 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 16.8248392259 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 4.34317383033 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 2.54639175258 314% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167628678078 0.216113520407 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519982851064 0.0766984524023 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383139038501 0.0603063233224 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892136794571 0.12726935374 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317108050598 0.0580467560999 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 8.37731958763 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 8.71597938144 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 7.59969072165 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 41.2886597938 242% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.