Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions? Discuss

Essay topics:

Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions? Discuss

Recently, the phenomenon of taking employees' suggestions and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that leading companies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, taking the company's decision can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of the public arena, making a decision might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the create processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of decision making policies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only, do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcome, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-08 3pid 88 view
2019-08-08 3pid 88 view
2019-08-08 3pid 88 view
2019-08-08 3pid 88 view
2019-08-08 3pid 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user pbdarab :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rsity has asserted that the downside of the create processes is correlated negatively with...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76666666667 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22537680831 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683333333333 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2494928594 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.818181818 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0982560537927 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346019302421 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531186315805 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533539698172 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349078553298 0.0609392437508 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.