Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of the benefits of experience as an effective way to teach and their corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that comparing to books can be a plus that I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, books and experiences as effective ways of teaching can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered current policies. Thus both beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, different types of teaching in an effective way might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of experiences for teaching far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 88
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 88
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 85
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give an example. 77
- Medical technology is responsible for a human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...iment that discovered current policies. Thus both beneficial ramifications of this c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of science, different types of teaching in an effective way might increase the consequences of crit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65416666667 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27791430977 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8221586211 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.7 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239692641923 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860312220535 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888931690575 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132358828725 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517080866994 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.