Many companies involve employees in decision making policy Some people think that it isimportant for the progression of the company To what extent do you agree or disagree

In the contemporary world, the progression of employees’ involvement in decision making policies of companies and its related effects has sparked a heated debate. While proponents adamantly assert that this involvement is quite beneficial for the prosperity of their company and business, the disparate envisage a complete disaccord with this disposition. This essay will scrutinize the fruits a company reaps by incorporating staff and workers in decision making process.

At the first place, there are myriad of arguments in favor of my stance in which the most preponderant one is that employees feel more confident as well as happy when their employer gives weightage to them in the form of taking their advice on plethora of different important decisions and they start working more efficiently. For instance, Noor Fabrics interview their staff for the imminent requirements, may it be personal or pertaining to the work and therefore always overcome a potential grim situation beforehand. As a result, it is quite evident that staff advice has a congenial benefit to both employer and the employee.

At the second place, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that no matter how diligent an employer may be; he can not get to the grass root level by himself and therefore can not access the underlying problems. For example, salary increment without inquiring the beneficiaries, can lead to unexpected repercussions as DJ Associates faced a protest from workers even after the revision of salaries. Consequently, it is advisable to stay connected with the staff and workers by taking their advice while making important decisions.

To recapitulate succinctly, it is quite clear from the citation above that staff involvement is mandatory for flourishing the business successfully. Therefore, I am consummately in accord with the incorporation of Employees in a firm’s important decision-making policy.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45973154362 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15939374552 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.175324319 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.909090909 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181172750047 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752393937303 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794777078606 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116223455335 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958949811617 0.0609392437508 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.