Medical technology is responsible for human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree
The importance pf medical life is responsible for human life expectancy, which has always been debatable, has now upsurged a lot of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of medical technology is responsible for human’s life expectancy has sparked the controversy over the potential of this trend in an integral part of society in recent years.It can be agreed that upside of medical technology is responsible for human’s life expectancy is instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawback as well. This essay will be elaborate both assertion and will provide to a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why medical technology is responsible for human life expectancy is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that in medical technology have new machines which easily caught diseases and done treatment these all. Example Brain tumor easily caught by the MRI scan.
However, these are some people who chose different think differently and hold on opposing viewpoints, which can certainly over where the potential influence of medical technology is responsible for human’s life expectancy? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that X-rays to harmful for brain and human body. The overdose of medicine is very danger for human liver.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of medical technology is responsible for human’s life expectancy. While it is evident that it has various benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored and have to be addressed and well balanced against its merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | padim30987 | 75 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | fereshteh.r | 77 | view |
- machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and these is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive and negative impact on people's life and work 55
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you brought forword to decrease this issue? 72
- It town and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small shops. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children. While others think it is dangerous and unhealthy.Which opinion do you agree with? discuss both options and give example 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ntegral part of society in recent years.It can be agreed that upside of medical te...
^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achines which easily caught diseases and done treatment these all. Example Brain...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sily caught diseases and done treatment these all. Example Brain tumor easily ca...
^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to harmful for brain and human body. The overdose of medicine is very danger for ...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnology is responsible for human's life expectancy. While it is evident tha...
^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and well balanced against its merits.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56870229008 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18114830881 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56106870229 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.1998472504 50.4703680194 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.9 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405557162178 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160122367599 0.0925447433944 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13368880469 0.071462118173 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254171418443 0.151781067708 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645874416301 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.94827586207 221% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.