Ireeefutably in this contemporary scenario, it is a common phenomenon in the human being lives in existing time. However, in this ways alter in masses talking with others in day to day lives. It has a double-edged award and this essay would shed light on the pors and cons analysis of development in this upcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with the most salient benefits can be drawn for the masses. The original point to be considered is that majority of individual influence by new technology. Although the trend of mobile phones and computer has altered interaction with each other, we can not neglect the fruitful impact of this trend. For example, nowadays, it is shown that a lot of individuals do work at home on this equipment and they are not needed for outside. Therefore, people not any change interact with others, but also people learn more information about the country.
Nevertheless, there are also innumerable demerits, which cannot be ignored. The provoking factor behind it is that owing to technology equipment individual distract from talking with surrounding people compare to past time. It is fact that despite young population more uses it, due to adverse bad effect on health and eye connect. In addition to, despite the reduction of friendship bond between people. For instance, in today time everyone wants to purchase this technology item . Ergo, which can be dangerous for their future.
To conclude, I pen down saying that this essay tends to iterate that although people enhance vast part and parcel knowledge from the technology, we can not neglect of awful effect for the younger generation lives.
- Some people play sport when they are young but then stop doing physical exercise when they become adults Why is this What can be done to solve this problem 56
- Some people think that young people should spend their free time with their families instead of enjoying outside entertainment However others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 38
- The charts give information about world forest in six different regions 11
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ing lives in existing time. However, in this ways alter in masses talking with other...
^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...king with surrounding people compare to past time. It is fact that despite young populati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e wants to purchase this technology item . Ergo, which can be dangerous for their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10820895522 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73723104059 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5426524375 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2666666667 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207024074415 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601159623652 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616979082522 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112548103296 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390072579909 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.