people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of transportation in populated cities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of road expanding is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that advanced transportation can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, progress in public transportation system might provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that reasonable price as well as convenient travel for commuters. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a reduction in traffic congestions strongly related to how fast and convenient the public transportation system is. Thus, the beneficial consequences of both passengers' financial benefit and comfort in transporting apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of transport development, road expansion for the vehicles might increase the consequences of more traffic jams. Moreover the fundamental aspects of establishing new road related to this reality that the demerits of new roads pertain to using private vehicle more. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of expanding roads are correlated negatively with using private cars. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of encouragement of new roads in using cars.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of improving transport system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of reducing traffic prove the significance of transportation system, but also pinpoint commuters' satisfaction.
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they could be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 31
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land therefore they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 90
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 77
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save it for the future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think that women should be able to do whatever job they are qualified for including police work while others think that is it wrong to allow woman to become police officers What is your opinion 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... the consequences of more traffic jams. Moreover the fundamental aspects of establishing...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'commuters'' or 'commuter's'?
Suggestion: commuters'; commuter's
...ransportation system, but also pinpoint commuters satisfaction.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72597864769 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33791514826 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3551689635 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218983530386 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734496893305 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394655473446 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114654685265 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033997231714 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.