As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an aging population for individuals and society? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of as a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated phenomenon is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that the disadvantages of an aging population for individuals and society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the advances in medical care increase the average of life expectancy for women can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, increasing life expectancy for men and women is the result of advances in medical care might increase the consequences of vital issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the aging population has disadvantages for individuals and society because of advances in medical care far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' of potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | vahid najafi | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | sanazlarijani | 88 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 85
- Some people point that experiential( i.e learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. What is your opinion? 85
- Some people argue that experience is the best teacher Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or formal school education How far do you agree with this idea Support your opinion with reasons and or your personal experience 93
- Some people indicate that certain kind of music can promote learning for young children, while many researches showed that results are mixed. What is your opinion? Use your own experience and observation. 88
- Criminals in prisons are dealing with new cases, and some are teaching them. Which method is more effective to reduce crime rate? Rehabilitation or punishment? Give examples. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58947368421 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22403638129 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582456140351 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.911456516 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38298806643 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131120168768 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123191718515 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226455180662 0.151781067708 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058768054782 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.