Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers.
The person would learn many things through insistence and practical experience than the training provided by the masters in the school. As per my knowledge, the person or student could learn more through encouragement and facts. Here, I am going to elaborate the two sides of argument in prospective way.
Firstly, it really depends upon the intellectual power of the people to grasp the things easily by self-training and enthusiasm. The great people in this world like Scientist Einstein had discontinued his education in the primary school and by his self-motivation, he learnt depth knowledge of gravitational force and many more basic fundamental of science. He never taught by graduates to pick the study materials. He shined as the father of science and recorded as the top most person who used his brain in saturated level.
Secondly, another group of people have needed training by their coaches in the institution. He doesn’t have the capability to learn the technics by his own. They don’t have the multi-task mind and handled many directions at a time. They could even have sophisticated the methodology of educational system by spoon feeding.
In conclusion, the institutional center has both types of personality which they are splendid in their attitudes. Nowadays, the new generation students need the guide and spark from the trainers and parents
- Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers. 11
- You are going to visit New Zealand for an ‘English and Homestay’ program.You have just received details of your homestay host family.Write your first letter to the family. In your letter introduce yourself ask the family some questions to get in 67
- Someone speaks but don't follow it in reality. Society accepts people with action not on basis of spoken words 67
- What is your opinion regarding the future of e-Learning? 65
- Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, really, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.5418719212 9% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28636363636 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04599384641 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6664694275 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4615384615 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0451046595853 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0157650858577 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339684097827 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.025808820627 0.151781067708 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025994092958 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.