Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).
It is quite common these days for some people to think that unpaid community service is invaluable for students in various aspects and should be a mandatory part of high school curriculum such as helping poor people, cleaning neighborhood or teaching sports to younger students. It seems to me that unpaid community service should be a mandatory program in high schools because of a number of reasons.
Unpaid community service allows students to learn to extend their hands to poor people. As a rational result, it results in having a generation that will have benevolent attitudes. Another positive influence of voluntary works can be considered as improving social skills of students. In fact, it enables pupils to work and talk in public, use their time effectively rather than wasting time, make new friends, and deters them from criminals.
Moreover, unpaid community service is a chance for students to practice imperative skills such as communicating, problem-solving, task management, and so forth. That is to say, it is a valuable work experience and prepares them for their future career. In effect, they would be more productive for their future employer and themselves.
In conclusion, volunteer community service is beneficial for both individual and community in diverse aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-19 | thule98.joanne | 80 | view |
- Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25-year-old is necessary 88
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible for solving it? What measures? 80
- Culture shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants What are the possible options to eradicate this issue 80
- The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate local produced food. What extent do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 77
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 205.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33170731707 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92945410755 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60487804878 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4017730218 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414167793087 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142110925155 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119695155017 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23195126087 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146950074853 0.0609392437508 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.