Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of violence portrayed on TV and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of entertaining activities played on TV is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mass media can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the mass media can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a source of information, as well as human behaviour, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered some useful websites. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both enthusiastic audiences and social norms apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the scene portrayed on TV might increase the consequences of law and crime. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the criminal offence could relate to this reality that the demerits of violent acts pertain to racial harassment. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of watching mass-media is correlated negatively with physical violence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social behaviour.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the mass media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of TV prove the significance of good behaviour, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Daniela Apolo Machado | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | smb.arami | 85 | view |
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. discuss. 85
- sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 88
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 85
- sports, plating in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48659003831 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24012004197 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2218994265 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0916815372989 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336548455481 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435976528998 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524764673002 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029599756413 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.