Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life, as well as work, and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of architectural features is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that an impressive building can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the design of the building can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a luxury apartment, as well as the interior designer, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the decorating job opportunities, the handmade goods and the contemporary art. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the modern lifestyles and positive work opportunities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the building design might increase the consequences of physical health problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a modern construction could relate to this reality that the demerits of working at a high level pertain to physical damages such as hand broken, falling fear and head injuries. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the high ceiling is correlated negatively with low ventilation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a property developer.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the design of the building far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a modern building prove the significance of equal opportunities, but also pinpoint luxurious life implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience? 85
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
- Global problems related to governments and international organizations, what are the problems and what is your opinion? 85
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give 88
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47524752475 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29741125058 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5585703609 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.25 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268391183742 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864310084005 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12958676532 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149606701246 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117481373521 0.0609392437508 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.