Speaking topics in text
TPO 44 - Question 4
Explain how the example in the lecture illustrates the concept of scope creep.
Speaking recording
Votes
This speaking topic by users
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Seema Modak | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-09-28 | ajulyav | 65.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-09-28 | ajulyav | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-11-19 | Seema Modak | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-09-28 | ajulyav | 60.00 | Check this speaking |
Speaking category
Speakings by user Seema Modak
:
- tpo 20-3 90
- TPO 31 - Question 6 Using the example of the owl and the wolf, explain how two special body features have helped arctic animals adapt to the cold. 83
- TPO27-1- Talk about a popular actor, musician or artist whose work you do not admire. Explain why you do not like this person's work. 83
- TPO 46 - Question 3No More Posters Outside the Student CenterTraditionally, students have been permitted to put up posters advertising events, clubs, and activities on the concrete wall outside the main entrance to the student center Beginning next semest 66
- TPO 27 - Question 6Using the examples from the lecture, explain two developments that allowed ancient Roman cities to expand. 66
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 701.0 592.248995984 118% => OK
No of words: 202.0 155.574297189 130% => OK
Chars per words: 3.4702970297 3.80514564318 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.525876923 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.570649393 1.79077849142 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 93.7148594378 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.604071249207 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Syllable count: 219.6 185.844578313 118% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.19417670683 92% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0212539034775 0.0650381309087 33% => It may have issues on recording quality or the content is not so closely related to content.
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 1.0 4.35341365462 23% => Need more acoustic paragraphs.
Average paragraph length: 202.0 68.503853103 295% => The average paragraph length is high.
STD paragraph length: 0.0 21.3332995233 0% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 57.79 25.9943957902 222% => Need to control the rhythm of the speech
STD paragraph duration: 0.0 7.84667146824 0% => The duration of acoustic paragraphs keeps same.
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 37.0 42.0642570281 88% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 5.45945945946 4.02192344571 136% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 5.46534336398 3.1217529195 175% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.55810810811 1.45093177766 107% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 1.48118075222 0.99851816184 148% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 35.0 39.0421686747 90% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 2.23 7.12997991968 31% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.0637142857143 0.185688545393 34% => Maybe the speech rate is too fast.
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.0491112855395 0.155154303396 32% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 52.37 47.1480722892 111% => OK
Average word duration: 0.259257425743 0.305395592593 85% => OK
STD word duration: 0.118329725052 0.189427763521 62% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 2.0 7.94979919679 25% => Good job, the lower, the better.
Total_disfluencies_duration: 1.29 6.2937751004 20% => Good job. The lower, the better.
Total acoustic noise duration: 0.8 3.39508032129 24% => Good job. The lower, the better.
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 57.79 59.7592369478 97% => Talk more. Do not save time. People can talk 4-5 words in one second.
Compare to expected duration: 0.963166666667 0.995987282463 97% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.60564111438 0.656000678711 92% => OK
Rate of speech: 3.49541443156 2.60215298798 134% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.92074753418 1.56821927147 122% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.1195340844 1.99336655568 106% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.294551069307 0.317803793328 93% => OK
---------------------
It may have duplicated content. Need to use the words more efficiently.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.