The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in shops between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates how frequently Americans consumed fast food in shops in three different years (2003, 2006, 2013).
Overall, the proportion of people in the USA having meals at fast-food restaurants once a week was the most in 2003 and 2006. In 2013, the majority of Americans ate fast food in shops once or twice a month.
In 2003 and 2006, more than one-third of Americans who had meals at fast-food shops once a week, the figure of the “once a week” catalog decreased to about 27% in 2013. The proportion of eating fast-food outlets in the USA once or twice a month declined by 5% during the first three years before rising to 33% in 2013.
Turning to other catalogs, the percentage of people who had fast food at restaurants in the USA fluctuated between 16% to 20% from 2003 to 2013, and these proportions were slightly higher than the “a few times a year” catalog. The frequencies of people in America visit fast-food outlets every day and never accounted for a very small percentage, ranging from just 3% to 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-27 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 100
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 42
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in shops between 2003 and 2013 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: DT_DT[3]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or '“a' is left.
Suggestion: the; “a
...e proportions were slightly higher than the “a few times a year” catalog. The frequenc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67759562842 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55483036058 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3646145598 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409925670504 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208174632499 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825891261549 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277687718868 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688443293631 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.