The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and future Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and future. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps give information about how changes of office building in now and future.
Overall, the map have one side to entrance and the best change about kitchen and canteen. However, we can see clearly if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the map in now. It can be seen that, the maps have ten areas including two grass, two entrances, four offices, one kitchen, canteen, store room and toilet. From the two side they have two grass and entrance place on the first grass. Meanwhile, at the bottom have four office and opposite them including kitchen, canteen and store room. However, the toilet is opposite the second grass and the entrance at the bottom at left side.
Look at the map in the future, the building are more comfortable and bigger also have some new areas but the entrance will not replace. However, the building in the future has eleven areas including four office, one storeroom, one meeting area, one toilet, coffee machine, meeting area and chair. The map in now four office at the bottom but the map in future, two office at the bottom and between them is entrance. Look at the left side can see the toilet at the top and opposite is coffee machine, meeting area and two chair for relax. Finally, the first grass will replace by outdoor seating area and three chair. So, it can be seen that, the map in the future has other furniture and more suitable to many people than in the past.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-24 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun office seems to be countable, so consider using: 'four offices'.
Suggestion: four offices
...st grass. Meanwhile, at the bottom have four office and opposite them including kitchen, ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun office seems to be countable, so consider using: 'four offices'.
Suggestion: four offices
...n the future has eleven areas including four office, one storeroom, one meeting area, one t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun office seems to be countable, so consider using: 'four offices'.
Suggestion: four offices
... meeting area and chair. The map in now four office at the bottom but the map in future, tw...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun office seems to be countable, so consider using: 'two offices'.
Suggestion: two offices
...ce at the bottom but the map in future, two office at the bottom and between them is entra...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 518, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun chair seems to be countable, so consider using: 'two chairs'.
Suggestion: two chairs
...ite is coffee machine, meeting area and two chair for relax. Finally, the first grass wil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 605, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun chair seems to be countable, so consider using: 'three chairs'.
Suggestion: three chairs
...ill replace by outdoor seating area and three chair. So, it can be seen that, the map in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54901960784 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13429908936 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450980392157 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1124341445 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109708658205 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521704174683 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621058361776 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10246785485 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759616303356 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.