Presently, the idea of wearing uniform at offices is initiated by many people especially employers. I strongly agree with this concept because dress code would give both us and our company a lot of benefits.
Manifolds reasons support the thought of setting uniform at work. Firstly, uniform can create benchmark and dilute social gap. This is very beneficial for us as employee because social gap somehow have negative impact in our professional relationship and mental health. For instance, we will easily comparing our achievement to others through fashion and accessories if we are not restricted in our clothes. Additionally, through wearing a uniform, we can save our money more. We will think twice for buying new dresses or shirts because we do not have time to wear it as everyday we have our uniform to wear. Consequently, we will cut our spending in something that is not urgent.
Regarding benefit that companies could gained through creating dress code, it can evidently grow self pride of the employees as a part of some company which directly affect their productivity and achievement in work. A study in Indonesia said that 70% of the employee of stated-owned corporation felt pride to wear uniform and ID card while working. The study also investigate their respondents self pride score to their productivity and the results said that it had positive association.
To sum up, setting dress code at work place has many positive impacts whether for the employees or the companies. However, dress code should be designed as comfort and fashionable as can be so that the employees also love and pride to wear it.
- Many people believe that it is a good idea to have a dress code at work place Do you agree or disagree with statement 67
- The diagram below shows process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Brick manufacturing 78
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- he table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summar
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'compare'
Suggestion: compare
...al health. For instance, we will easily comparing our achievement to others through fashi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'gain'
Suggestion: gain
... Regarding benefit that companies could gained through creating dress code, it can ev...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d gained through creating dress code, it can evidently grow self pride of the emp...
^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... said that it had positive association. To sum up, setting dress code at work pl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7908359737 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581481481481 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4563256576 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180623532108 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646716449996 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729799849133 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131959191252 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796356020718 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.