In recent times, advancements in technology and improvements in healthcare have led to the prevailing belief that individuals living in the 21st century experience a superior quality of life compared to their predecessors from earlier centuries. I wholeheartedly concur with this assertion, and this essay will elucidate the reasons that support my viewpoint.
To begin with, advancements in medical science and healthcare technology have contributed to an increase in life expectancy. Over the years, significant innovations have been made in the medical field that substantially reduce susceptibility to chronic diseases while also providing invaluable guidance on maintaining better health through proper diet and nutrition. For instance, in Japan, the population has access to advanced surgical technologies and adheres to government-recommended dietary practices, which has resulted in the country boasting the highest life expectancy in the world. Consequently, individuals in contemporary society enjoy greater opportunities for extended lifespans.
Moreover, the proliferation of innovative technologies has empowered children in the modern era to maximize their potential. In contrast to previous centuries, when young people often lacked the resources to explore their curiosity about the universe, today's youth are encouraged by educational authorities to engage with scientific disciplines such as astronomy and cosmology. This not only enhances their knowledge in these fields but also ensures a future workforce that is well-prepared to contribute to societal progress. Thus, the younger generation of the 21st century not only benefits from abundant career prospects but also enjoys an enriched environment that fosters personal development and innovation.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain that individuals living in the contemporary world have an improved quality of life compared to those from earlier centuries. This enhancement is fundamentally attributable to advancements in healthcare and technology that provide better health outcomes and facilitate opportunities for education and growth.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ir predecessors from earlier centuries. I wholeheartedly concur with this asserti...
^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...lopment and innovation. In conclusion, I firmly maintain that individuals living...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13468013468 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43508937565 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619528619529 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7990819575 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.833333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162711018921 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529072313919 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589097138923 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101847166209 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351615025057 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 13.28 50.2224549098 26% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.57 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.