Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways or on improving public
transportations? There seems to be a difficult problem since many reasons should be involved.
However, after carefully pondering it, I buttress the last one, spending the money on improving
public transportation. The reasons are presented below:
There is no denying that improving the public transportation will surely alleviate the pollution
given off by enormous cars. If a city has not a developed public transportation, the air will be
polluted more heavily. What a dirty environment we will live in! Every day breathing into the air
filled with the flour of the gasoline, seeing the sky with the dull color will be the title of our life.
So the essence of environment has been realized by an increasingly number of people, to the
governments, the protection of environment is especially an undeniable mission.
Another reason I agree with it is that developed public transportation will decrease the frequency
of the traffic jams. Perhaps no worse word than “traffic jams” exists, to the businessmen who
believe in “Time is money”. Traffic jams not only cost the people time and expense, but also
create a bad mood for work. It greatly decreases the efficiency of the whole city. I imagine how
can a city whose avenue full of traffic jams develop its economics?
Finally, I want to say that improving the public transportation provide a great number of ways of
transportation for most of the poor people who can not afford to buy a car. It is known that our
citizens is not made of only people who has the ability to own a car, but the very poor people are
also included. I believe that however the technology is improved, the public apparatus should not
be ignored, because it serves the people all over the city.
Nevertheless, the private transportation has its own advantages, for instance, it can save a lot of
time in some cases, provide some convenience for people. But improving on roads and highways
is advantageous only conditionally. Based on the above discussion, I agree with the opinion that
the government should spend money on improving public transportation not only it can protect
environment and save time for people, but it also can create a convenient environment for all the
citizens.
- City are now expanding, the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 55
- City are now expanding, the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 52, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('increasingly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('number') instead of another adjective.
...nce of environment has been realized by an increasingly number of people, to the governments, the pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1207.87684729 165% => OK
No of words: 386.0 242.827586207 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16062176166 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 3.92707691288 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09184056943 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 379.143842365 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4389510057 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.25397266985 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.12807881773 606% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212089459001 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692974145798 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682466621869 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603253793129 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603437806613 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.