The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of mass media powerful influence and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of shaping people's minds is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that growing public awareness can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, channels of communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that media, as well as information revolution, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered changing people's lifestyle. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both print media and visual media apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, cultural influence might increase the consequences of information sharing. Moreover, fundamental aspects of broadcasting relate to this reality that the demerits of societal cohesion pertain to degrade family relationship. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of waste time is correlated negatively with obtaining information. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of messaging applications.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of global media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of internet, tv, and newspapers prove the significance of effective communication, but also pinpoint social media implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-25 | dhavalpatel095 | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-09 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 11
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 85
- Global problems related to governments and international organizations, what are the problems and what is your opinion? 11
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83333333333 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32949514474 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686507936508 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7971934838 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109608321819 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351261832051 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333448750051 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060114659774 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279854675708 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.