Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Submitted by ahmad4039 on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 13:25

Recently, the phenomenon of advertising and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that using advertisements is highly beneficial. Such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that selling goods via advertisements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the mental standpoint, advertising can provide a society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that alluring pictures, as well as annual sales, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of advertising at initial years of newborn companies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of advertisements can be seen.

Within the realm of requisite goods, vivid colors might increase the consequences of advertising. Moreover, fundamental aspects of using Media relate to this reality that the demerits of printed advertisements pertain to their coverage range. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of sales of some goods is correlated with not doing appropriate advertising. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the positive role of promotional activities.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of advertising far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of high sales of goods prove the significance of the role of advertising, but also pinpoint business Implications.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that using advertisem...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66007905138 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40452750653 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0733216514 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158853051013 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494747147863 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388491236035 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908184813929 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175724946831 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.