do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what are the reasons for that ?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the bungee jumping highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that adventure sport can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the hazardous activity standpoint, the risky activity can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that unusual experience, as well as improving the intellectual property, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered hardworking to win the sports. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both fame and money can be seen.
Within the realm of the sportsman, developing self-confidence might increase the consequences of motivation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of accomplishment relate to this reality that the demerits of rising self-steam pertain to improving sports skills. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the stressful situation in skydiving is correlated negatively with trying new occasion in the bungee jumping. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of imitating sports lifesyle.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of adventure sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of risky job prove the significance of forgetting life failure, but also pinpoints of excitment implications.
- mass media 85
- The illiterates of the 21 st century are not those who can not read and write, but those who cannot learn - Alvin Toffler. explain the statement and do you agree or disagree. 11
- successful spors stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters.do you support it or not? 85
- the environmental we live in is in danger.what are the underlying causes?who is responsible to combat this? 11
- The environment we live in is in danger. what are the underlying causes? who is responsible to combat this? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of risky job prove the significance of forgetting life failure, but also pinpoi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74509803922 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31988984591 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8098467508 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.083333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800272768739 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024042977761 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319653072609 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0436926910734 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301835479257 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.