People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People’s quality of life has improved tremendously over the centuries. The important factors for this change are due to upmarket infrastructure, advanced medical facilities and various initiatives taken by the government to bring up people’s living standard. However, some people believe, the pollution in the atmosphere and quality of food is slowly getting deteriorated which poses a dire threat to the humanity. In my opinion, I strongly agree to this thought, that the quality of life has grown when compared to centuries ago, which will be discussed in the following passage.
The improved infrastructure helps to people to lead quality life, and better transport connectivity reduce the transit duration; such facilities were not enjoyed by our ancestors. For instance, my grand parents were travelling for 16 hours to reach the city, due to the improved transportation system the travelling time is being reduced in leaps and bounds. In addition, the quality of food is being constantly monitored by the government to cater quality eatable to every citizen, but some people argue that the food consumed by our ancestors were more nutritious that now. Thus, it is believed the quality of life has been grown in 21st century which is good sign.
Further more, the advancement in medical facilities aided people to live longer, various life threatening diseases are easily identified and cured. On the other side, people who lived centuries ago died due ignorance and improper medications. Therefore, current generation people are benefitted because of upmarket medical facilities when compared to our ancestors.
To sum up, as the technology grows it directly improves the quality of life which I believe there won’t be any second thought, also this has cascading effect to all living beings in the universe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-28 | jatinder890 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that museums and art galleries should concentrate on the history and art of their own country rather than the works of art of other parts of the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94076519342 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2659261986 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233206012659 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976318068756 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564356663415 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139452445826 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420141040934 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.