professors are good to appear on TV or not.
The lecture and the reading passage is about the appearance or participation of professors on TV. The reading passage gives its three reasons to support the idea of participation of university professors on TV. While the lecture contradicts all of it's three reasons of support and give three reasons those are totally against the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading passage claims that if professors those are found in classrooms, libraries and busy in doing research, if they appear on TV and give their expert opinions in different TV programs, these programs will be of great importance and will benefit the general public. In contrast the lecture contradicts this statement and states that, it has disadvantages and this appearance on TV will not give good reputation to that professor and he won't be able to get invitations from the conferences.
Secondly the passage posits that if the professor from any university will appear on TV, that university will get more and more donations and positive publicity and will get more students applications. The professor opposes this idea and claims that TV appearance will be very time consuming, which can waste professor's time. Especially rehearsal, camera makeups and many other issues which can effect the time of the professor, that time can be beneficial for the students and can be good for research. In result the benefits which can be given to student can be spoiled.
Finally, the reading passage states that, the viewers can get a taste of real expertise and can get insight if any professor appears on TV screen, this idea is opposed by professor, by this statement that all the history and other infos can be given by any reporter, so its not necessary that professor should visit any TV program.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | himal | view | |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
- venus planet and human life generation at planetThe lecture and the reading are both discussing about the planet venus and how to develop life at venus planet. The author in reading is against the ideas of developinghuman life at venus but the lecturer s 70
- supervisor and its qualities 60
- supervisor and its qualities 60
- teaching methods 70
- professors are good to appear on TV or not. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...f great importance and will benefit the general public. In contrast the lecture contradicts th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...and will benefit the general public. In contrast the lecture contradicts this statement ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professor should visit any TV program.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0409556314 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75135709611 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450511945392 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2256816736 49.2860985944 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.7 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312420374571 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157330161838 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100133603789 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213186962343 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415912709359 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.