Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that all of abilities and skills are learning able especially, the ability of leadership. Contrary to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that this kind of abilities are only genetically and cannot to be learn. I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that the ability of leadership is just naturally.
First and foremost, Todays's, psychologists substantiated that the ability of leadership like some others abilities, for example, good relationship and social activities can be taught and improved through practice. Because of this fact, all of the schools have some plan to prepare student about this important issue. For example, when I was in basic school, every two weeks, one of the students should be work as an agent in the classroom. During this program, all of us practicing responsibility and guiding the member's ideas.
On another significant fact, that should be taken into the consideration is that any of ingenious cannot be exhibited themselves without presenting in the correct circumstances. For example, in the past time, a lot of people with wonderful cleverness suppressed and remained on known or became silenced for always. Surely, the ability of leadership can come from the genetic background of the person but without teaching and promoting cannot appear. On the other hand, the impact of teaching in the ability of leadership observed when we compare some educated people about this field with uneducated and we see that people who spend some learning period are more successful than people who naturally have this ability. For instance, I was a very shy child and most of the time did not enroll even in group activities till guiding a group.But, now I am guider our mountain climbing group of university and have the very active role in some other social activities.
On the basis of reason that mentioned above, I am convinced that the ability of leadership does not depend on only genetics and it is learning able. Based on the psychologist's concepts and my own experience I am sure about it.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cellphone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to 73
- TPO 34 75
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 48
- TPO 37 3
- TPO 45-integrated 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...through practice. Because of this fact, all of the schools have some plan to prepare stude...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worked', 'wrought'?
Suggestion: worked; wrought
...wo weeks, one of the students should be work as an agent in the classroom. During th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...rect circumstances. For example, in the past time, a lot of people with wonderful clevern...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...emained on known or became silenced for always. Surely, the ability of leadership can ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 838, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...n group activities till guiding a group.But, now I am guider our mountain climbing ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, for example, for instance, kind of, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82168516358 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1409032739 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147097848164 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562157130385 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430312463131 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916006408166 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329402290188 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.